Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Revealing code of conduct designed to prevent sleaze

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government will launch a fresh attack on sleaze this week with the publication of a new ministerial code that is designed to prevent a repetition of the controversies that surrounded Keith Vaz and Peter Mandelson.

The new code of conduct will force ministers to reveal their financial interests to their most senior civil servants when they take office, including any links to businessmen such as the billionaire Hinduja brothers.

It will be accompanied by the inaugural code of conduct governing ministers' special advisers' and spin-doctors to prevent "bullying" of civil servants. The revised rules are framed to prevent further embarrassing revelations over ministers' financial affairs,

Ministers were required to dispose of any financial interest "giving rise to actual or perceived conflict" under the previous ministerial code. They were not required to inform the Government of their interests, although many chose to.

Under the new rules ministers have to report to their permanent secretaries any potential conflicts of interest with their role in government, including meetings with lobbyists. They will also be told to seek guidance from senior civil servants as to whether their actions contravene the code.One senior Whitehall source said: "There is serious concern that permanent secretaries will be caught up in a rubber-stamping job for ministers' conduct. Civil servants could be left carrying the can. It would be up to the minister whether he went ahead with the permanent secretaries' guidance. We need an assurance that permanent secretaries won't get embroiled."

The move responds to advice from Sir Nigel Wicks, the new chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, that all meetings between the government, business and lobbyists are properly recorded.

Downing Street appeared to be "in the dark" over damaging allegations about ministers' business links during Labour's first term. It was forced to conduct its own inquiry to establish whether Mr Mandelson intervened to help the Hinduja brothers gain a passport. The Hammond inquiry findings cleared the former Northern Ireland secretary of acting wrongly in the Hinduja affair, even though he had already quit his post.

Under the new rules Mr Mandelson would have had to tell civil servants of his £373,000 home loan from Geoffrey Robinson, a former paymaster general. He only informed them when the facts were about to be revealed in the press.

Tony Blair's links to the Hinduja brothers came under fresh scrutiny yesterday because of a report that said Downing Street instructed Mr Mandelson to contact the Hindujas about a possible donation to the Dome. Downing Street has sought to distance itself from the Hinduja brothers, who are facing allegations of corruption involving an arms deal in India.

But MPs will be critical if the new code does not force Mr Blair to take responsibility for ministers' conduct. The Public Administration Committee said recently the parliamentary ombudsman should be given fresh powers to run independent investigations designed to ensure ministers were not misusing or exploiting high office.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in