Revamped debates 'a waste of money'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cross-party consensus over modernisation of the House of Commons suffered another setback yesterday.
Sittings in Westminster Hall, where MPs hold debate in a continental-style semi-circle, cost the taxpayer £13,000 a month and Tories say the debates are a waste of money.
Owen Paterson, the MP for North Shropshire, complained about "poorly attended debates with no atmosphere" in the new parallel chamber in which backbenchers can call debates. "My main memories are tourists in buses passing behind a minister's head and bemused schoolchildren going out of a squeaky door," he said.
Margaret Beckett, the Leader of the House, said the experimental sittings provided MPs with time for 200 extra debates each year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments