Report into Holyrood fiasco blames no one
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Systematic failures and catastrophically expensive decisions led to more than £150m of taxpayers' money being wasted in the building of Scotland's new parliament - but no single agent is to blame, an official inquiry has concluded.
Systematic failures and catastrophically expensive decisions led to more than £150m of taxpayers' money being wasted in the building of Scotland's new parliament - but no single agent is to blame, an official inquiry has concluded.
After 43 days of evidence, more than 60 witnesses and six months of deliberation, Lord Fraser of Carmyllie published his report yesterday into the Holyrood building fiasco and said there was "no single villain of the piece". The Tory peer said that the three-year delay in completing the building - at £431m, 10 times over budget - was due to a "series of systematic failures and an unwillingness of those involved to call a halt and demand an appraisal".
Announcing his findings yesterday at the Land Court in Edinburgh, Lord Fraser said "some catastrophically expensive decisions" had been made. Chief among these, he said, was the decision by project managers in July 1998, not cleared with ministers, to follow the procurement route of "construction management" - under which the client has full control but carries all the risk. He said that the Scottish Parliament did not fully grasp the risks for nearly two years after the project was handed over to them.
The 264-page report cleared the late first minister Donald Dewar of deliberately misleading MSPs about the cost of the project, but criticised the civil service under Sir Muir Russell for failing to provide accurate cost estimates. Lord Fraser said it was also unfair to lay the blame on the architect, the late Enric Miralles, as "he was always a concept designer rather than a manager".
He said the original White Paper cost estimate of £40m was "a myth", and that a budget of about £200m would have been more accurate.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments