Rachel Reeves warned not to target farmers for a second time as she searches for spending cuts
Labour told not to take money from flood defences and farm schemes in wake of inheritance tax raid in the Budget
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rachel Reeves has been warned that farmers should not be “punished” further as she searches for spending cuts following her inheritance tax raid in the Budget.
The chancellor did not rule out emergency cuts on Tuesday as she responded to days of market turmoil and the growing cost of government borrowing. On Monday Keir Starmer also said the Treasury would be ‘ruthless’ in cutting spending.
The Chancellor has already prompted fury in the countryside with the ‘farming tax’ hike, which critics warn could sound the death knell for family firms in England.
Now fears have been raised that they could be hit by a double whammy if Ms Reeves makes cuts to the Environment Land Management (Elm) scheme.
Late last year the Treasury flagged that “the government is facing significant funding pressures on flood defences and farm schemes of almost £600 million in 2024-25”.
It added that “while the government is meeting those commitments this year, it is necessary to review these plans from 2025-26 to ensure they are affordable”.
Jerome Mayhew, the Tory MP for Broadland and Fakenham in Norfolk, who will lead a debate in Parliament on farmland flooding on Wednesday told MailOnline: “There is a real risk that farmers will bear the brunt of future cuts to fix Labour’s mess.
“Not content with cutting agricultural property relief, the government seems primed to cut the nature-friendly farming budget after 2026.
“Cutting this budget would be a fool’s errand for a government supposedly wanting to protect communities from flooding, fight climate change, protect nature, and support British farmers.
‘The government should be figuring out how to raise the nature-friendly farming budget in line with inflation, not punishing farmers further.”
A Defra spokeswoman told the publication: “Our commitment to farmers is steadfast.
“That is why this government is investing £5 billion into farming over the next two years – the largest ever directed at sustainable food production and in our country’s history. We are going further with reforms to boost profits for farmers by backing British produce and reforming planning rules on farms to support food production.
‘As we set out in our Plan for Change, we are focused on supporting our farmers, supporting rural economic growth and boosting Britain’s food security.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments