Dominic Raab wants to curb judges’ powers over government, leaked document suggests

Reported proposals aimed at making it harder to bring successful judicial reviews

Justice secretary Dominic Raab is considering introducing a series of changes that could limit government accountability in judicial reviews, a leaked document suggests.

The cabinet minister is weighing up moves likely to make it more difficult for claimants who wish to challenge public bodies’ decisions to bring successful legal cases against the government, according to a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) paper.

“You [Mr Raab] have indicated that you are minded to consult on further reforms to judicial review,” the document seen by The Guardian reportedly states.

The paper says the document goes on to make suggestions for Mr Raab’s desired changes “subject to your initial policy steers and the outcome of any consultation”.

Proposed changes in the document reportedly range from dictating the criteria judges must apply in cases to increasing the cost burden if parties are found not to have standing.

Labour pounced on the document, with shadow justice secretary Steve Reed saying the reported changes showed the government thinks “the law only applies to the little people”.

The Labour MP said: “This leak is yet more proof that the lord chancellor and this arrogant Conservative government think that the law only applies to the little people.”

“Whether it’s their attacks on judicial review, the billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money handed out to their mates in Covid contracts, the Partygate scandal or their so-called ‘Bill of Rights’ which will stop victims of crime getting justice, the Conservatives have shown their contempt for the British people.”

An MoJ spokesperson responded: “We do not comment on leaked documents.”

Charlie Whelton, policy and campaigns officer at human rights group Liberty, said the document “suggests that the government plans to make it even harder for people to challenge them and make themselves even less accountable to the public”.

Pointing to plans to replace the Human Rights Act, the campaigner said: “The government is determined to make it as difficult as possible to take them to court and hold them accountable for unlawful actions.”

“Whether by putting up more barriers to bringing cases, overturning judgments they don’t like or blocking off more and more actions from challenge, the government’s attempts to avoid accountability set a very dangerous precedent for all future governments of all stripes.”

Tracy Doig, head of international advocacy at Freedom from Torture, described the plans as “chilling”, saying: “The independence of the judiciary from government influence is a cornerstone of democracy in this country, based on hundreds of years of legal precedence.

She added: “Raab’s chilling vision of a government above the law is a threat to the rights that protect every one of us.”

The government has introduced plans for a Bill of Rights to replace the Human Rights Act, which would mean the UK does not always have to follow case law from Strasbourg and the Supreme Court in London is the ultimate decision-maker on human rights issues.

It comes after the Europe Court of Human Rights, which interprets the European Convention on Human Rights, blocked plans to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.

The government insists the reform would strengthen freedom of speech and prevent “trivial” legal claims, but opponents say it would limit the ability of citizens to challenge the state.