Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Public workers' rights at risk

Barrie Clement
Wednesday 12 March 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The job security of hundreds of thousands of British workers was undermined yesterday by a surprise European Court ruling.

The decision means that the "contracting out" of public services will now be far more hazardous for the employees concerned. Under the judgment, the terms and conditions of workers will not be automatically protected when their employer loses a contract and the work is transferred to another company.

The ruling by judges in Luxembourg, on a case brought by a German cleaner, will no doubt be welcomed by ministers who are keen to promote the contracting out of state-funded services. It will also prompt a fresh wave of litigation between employers and unions.

Lawyers yesterday said the decision would reopen the debate over whether all work contracted out by state-owned public services was covered by the European Acquired Rights Directive, under which the rights of employees are protected when a new contractor was appointed. John McMullen, head of the employment department at solicitors Pinset Curtis, said it would leave uncertainty over the degree of job security enjoyed by employees whose work had been contracted out.

Critical to any decision about whether the directive applied was if there had been a "transfer of undertakings" between one company and another. Such a transfer was said to have taken place if the incoming company took over tangible or intangible assets of the old contractor, its employees or its customers.

Unions fear the ruling means that where the new company takes over only a proportion of existing employees, it may now be possible to argue that the directive does not operate. Existing workers could then be taken over by the successful bidder on inferior terms and conditions. The out-going contractor who would have to foot redundancy bills for those left.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in