Public service reforms 'restoring balance between state and citizen'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government's public service reforms are helping to restore a proper balance to the relationship between state and citizen, William Waldegrave, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, claimed yesterday.
While use of the word 'restore' is a clue to Mr Waldegrave's acceptance of past and present imbalance, constitutional change is ruled out as a pursuit of the 'chattering' classes in Public Service and the Future: Reforming Britain's Bureaucracies, published by the Conservative Political Centre.
'When times are gloomy, people start writing clever new constitutions,' Mr Waldegrave says. 'Thank goodness, Britain's institutions have a low centre of gravity. But it is time for those who want to preserve the British way of doing things to fight back.'
In the pamphlet, Mr Waldegrave concentrates on the Government's 'five step' public service reform programme. That involved first, a 'fundamental reappraisal of the role of government itself; and secondly, 'after privatising all that we should', practical methods for preventing the remaining public sector reinfecting itself with inefficiency, insensitivity and waste.
The second objective was best met by compulsory competitive tendering and market testing, the precursors to contracting out, in local and central government, Mr Waldegrave writes. The third step was the extension of the 'purchaser/provider' split (such as that in the Government's NHS changes); the fourth was separating the civil service into smaller 'Next Step' agency units operating at arm's length from Whitehall. The fifth was the introduction of the Citizen's Charter.
Three of these have sufferent setbacks, however. The Treasury Solicitor's department and the Government's law officers have warned that the inferior pay and conditions usually offered when public services are contracted out can be illegal under EC law.
The Public Accounts Committee, the Commons watchdog on spending and efficiency, reported yesterday that there had been no obvious improvement in the first 'Next Steps' agency, the Vehicle Inspectorate, set up in August 1988. And a Cabinet Office survey, to be published by Mr Waldegrave today, reveals a high degree of public ignorance of the purpose of the Citizen's Charter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments