Portillo derides job subsidies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michael Portillo, the Thatcherite Secretary of State for Employment, last night launched an outspoken attack on "clever-clever ideas" for job creation, while being driven to a grudging defence of the existing Workstart scheme and the National Insurance holiday for long-term jobless announced in Kenneth Clarke's last Budget.
Labour, which pledged generous "dole to work" incentives in its shadow Budget, was quick to seize on the difference of approach.
In a speech to the London Rotary Club, Mr Portillo dismissed as "tricksters" those who devised "schemes, ruses or some clever-clever ideas which they claim will not only solve unemployment but actually save the Government money". In most cases, "one man's subsidy is another man's tax rise," and governments could not create jobs.
"If the Government pays subsidies to employers to hire people, some of the people hired are likely to be people who would have got a job anyway . . . you pay subsidies to one set of firms who undercut another set of firms, who lay people off."
He added: "You may well ask why, if I think this is a mug's game, the Government does use employment subsidies such as Workstart . . . and why it is introducing a National Insurance holiday for the long-term unemployed. We see such policies as a way of expanding the supply of labour by getting the long-term unemployed into jobs, perhaps by reducing employer prejudice towards them . . . We know they cost money - and we do not pretend that they don't cost money."
Harriet Harman, Labour's employment spokesman, said: "Instead of putting forward what he plans to do to cut unemployment he sets up a caricature of Labour's approach in order to devote an entire speech to attacking it."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments