Porter's offshore assets frozen
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The worldwide hunt for Dame Shirley Porter's fortune took a huge step forward yesterday when Westminster City Council announced it had frozen millions of pounds of its former leader's assets.
The Tesco heiress owes the Tory borough £37m in surcharges because of the "homes-for-votes" gerrymandering scandal in the 1980s. The House of Lords confirmed the fine two years ago for Dame Shirley's role in attempts to sell council homes to potential Tory voters in marginal wards.
Once reputed to be the 20th richest woman in Europe, with an estimated fortune of £60m, Dame Shirley said she had just £300,000 when ordered by a court to disclose her assets.
The council, which has spent hundreds of thousands of pounds pursuing Dame Shirley - who now lives in Israel - yesterday said it had asked various courts to lift gagging orders, which had previously prevented details of its legal actions being publicised.
The High Court had granted Westminster disclosure orders in camera against accounts in the British Virgin Islands and Guernsey as well as England, with Dame Shirley's son John one of 14 individuals and companies involved.
In a statement, the council said: "The disclosure orders have produced for the council a very substantial amount of information. The assets disclosed ... as a result of the court orders are held in trusts and companies in other jurisdictions."
The council declined to be specific on the sums involved but The Independent understands that they run to several millions. "We have won a battle, not the war, but this is a substantial amount of money," a senior source said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments