Pollution inspector's interests questioned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A MINISTER'S statement that the Chief Inspector of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution had, on appointment, 'divested himself of all interests' in an environmental consultancy, was challenged in a Commons motion yesterday, writes Anthony Bevins.
On Wednesday, Michael Howard, Secretary of State for the Environment, told Simon Hughes, the Liberal Democrat MP, that David Slater had disclosed his interests in the consultancy, Technica Ltd, when he applied for the HMIP post early in 1991.
Dr Slater got the job and cut all links with the company on 27 March 1991.
But yesterday in a Commons motion urging the Prime Minister to set up a compulsory public register of interests for senior civil servants, Mr Hughes noted 'a discrepancy' between Mr Howard's answer 'and Technica Ltd's share register return submitted to Companies House and dated 31 March 1992'. He said that it recorded 'among the issued share capital 'at the date of this return' 5,100 ordinary shares in the name of David Slater'.
The motion asked Mr Howard to investigate and clarify whether his use of 'interests' applied to Dr Slater's shareholding as well as to his directorship.
Mr Hughes has also criticised the fact that three months after Dr Slater's appointment last year, the department awarded DNV Technica a contract 'which was not let by competitive tender'.
Mr Howard has said that Technica had been bought out by a company called DNV 'and reconstituted as a wholly-owned subsidiary, DNV Technica'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments