Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Political wrangling over control orders intensified today as another senior Tory backed the controversial system.
Sir Malcolm Rifkind, chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee, followed former Conservative leader Lord Howard in arguing there was no safe alternative.
The Liberal Democrats campaigned for the abolition of control orders at the general election, with Chris Huhne - now Energy Secretary - describing them as an "affront to British justice".
There had been speculation that the junior coalition partner was on the verge of getting its way on the issue, after taking a major hit over university tuition fee hikes.
However, Prime Minister David Cameron is now coming under mounting pressure from within his own party to ensure that the main elements of the monitoring system remain in place.
Sir Malcolm told the Evening Standard: "I think there are quite dangerous people for whom they provide the least unsatisfactory method of control.
"The problem exists because they can't be imprisoned without trial - nor is it safe to allow them to be at liberty without some sort of constraint.
"If there are ways in which they can be made less rigorous without losing their primary purpose that obviously needs to be looked at. At the moment I'm inclined towards saying they should continue."
Earlier, Downing Street denied that tough negotiations between coalition allies over the fate of control orders could leave people at risk.
Former Director of Public Prosecutions and Lib Dem peer Lord Macdonald has been carrying out a review of the measures, and the Prime Minister's spokesman said the outcome was due "very shortly".
"We will take our decision based on what is in the interests of national security," the spokesman said.
"National security is going to be uppermost in our minds as we take that decision."
Mr Cameron's Lib Dem deputy Nick Clegg is delivering a speech on civil liberties later this week, but aides said it would not include any announcements on control orders.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments