Plan to axe child benefits condemned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Downing Street last night stood by Tony Blair's plans to cut child benefit for the parents of unruly youngsters, in the face of bitter criticism from Labour MPs and charities.
The Prime Minister has ordered an investigation into the feasibility of stopping the benefit in the cases of persistent law-breakers and truants. If implemented, a family with one child could lose £15.75 a week, rising to £17.55 for a single parent.
Downing Street officials said he had been "astonished" to discover that 80 per cent of truants caught in police checks of shopping centres were with an adult, often a parent. Mr Blair's spokesman said: "We are totally serious about measures to deal with the problem of parents who do not face up to their responsibilities."
But the plan sparked an uproar among Labour MPs. Even members of the Cabinet apparently had misgivings, and John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, gave the scheme a lukewarm response, saying he would be prepared to "consider it as a possibility".
The Halifax MP, Alice Mahon, warned ministers faced a backbench rebellion if they pressed ahead with the idea. She could not understand "how cutting income to some of the poorest families in the country" would help parents tackle juvenile crime. "It seems to me a back-of-an-envelope idea, probably from some overpaid adviser. I am sure it will be opposed hugely within the party," she told Radio 4's The World This Weekend.
Paul Cavadino, chief executive of the National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders, said: "By increasing stress and hardship, removing benefits would be counter-productive. It would be more likely to increase youth offending."
But John Dunford, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, said: "It could work in some cases where the children are not completely out of control."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments