'Perverse' Blair stifles Iraq debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tony Blair's government stands charged with being "somewhere between perverse and hypocritical" in its attempts to stifle dissent in tomorrow's Commons debate on Iraq.
A broad consensus of Labour MPs – ranging from those opposed on principle to war against Saddam Hussein to others anxious that action is taken only with United Nations agreement – have faced heavy lobbying by cabinet ministers and government whips ahead of the debate.
Many are angry that the Government – in concert with the Conservative front bench – has agreed a motion whose wording does not allow MPs to vote against it without appearing to be hostile to the UN process of weapons inspections. There is further fury about alleged attempts to prevent amendments being made that would allow opponents to voice their objections to an American-led war, particularly without the consent of the international community.
Alan Simpson, MP for Nottingham South, said this would probably be the last time Parliament was able to give its view on threatened military action before it actually happened. "It seems somewhere between perverse and hypocritical to be talking about the need for war on Iraq in the name of democratic rights when the last thing they are prepared to do as a government is practise them," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments