Pension age plans could be hastened
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE POSSIBLE speed-up of government plans to equalise the age of women's and men's retirement for state pension purposes has been raised in two letters from the Department of Social Security to Dennis Skinner, Labour MP for Bolsover, writes Anthony Bevins.
Replying to queries raised by two of Mr Skinner's women constituents, Ann Widdecombe, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Social Security, sent him two copies of a letter saying that no final decision had been taken.
Miss Widdecombe said that a common state pension age of 60 was one option, but cost was a significant factor - as it was when considering the raising of women's state pension age to 65.
But the minister's two letters differed significantly when it came to time-scale. In one letter she said that if the first woman who had queried government policy was 'only 18 months from retirement she cannot possibly be affected by anything we decide. She may be completely reassured.'
She wrote in the second that if that woman was 'only four years from retirement, it is extremely unlikely that she will be affected by any decision we take. She may be reassured on this point.'
Mr Skinner said there was a significant difference between reassurance and complete reassurance - opening up the possibility that the Government was considering earlier-than-expected changes.
In BBC Television's On the Record last November, Peter Lilley, Secretary of State for Social Security, said: 'We should be clear that we're talking about a change which is only going to be introduced probably in the next century.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments