Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Peers deal Howard a further rebuke

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE HOUSE of Lords last night delivered another rebuke to Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, by voting to outlaw the sale of confidential information.

Peers ignored warnings from Earl Ferrers, Home Office minister of state, that the provision would be difficult to enforce.

Dealing the latest blow to Mr Howard's flagship Criminal Justice and Public Order Bill, they voted by 163 to 111 for an amendment sponsored by Lord Brightman, the former Law Lord, and Baroness Nicol, for Labour.

The new clause would aim to crack down on private investigation agencies, making it an offence to sell or offer to sell personal financial information obtained dishonestly or by deception and without consent.

It would ban advertisements and brochures by agencies offering to sell information about, for example, someone's bank balance. The maximum penalty would be five years' jail and a fine.

Lord Ferrers backed instead the Government's proposal to outlaw the procuring of computer-held personal information. He said this would be easier to enforce.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in