Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former Tory treasurer among peers to be punished for refusing anti-bullying training

The ‘Valuing Everyone’ courses were introduced after Parliament was rocked by allegations

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 08 July 2021 16:18 BST
Comments
Lord James of Blackheath, Lord Kalms and Lord Willoughby de Broke have been been named-and-shamed
Lord James of Blackheath, Lord Kalms and Lord Willoughby de Broke have been been named-and-shamed (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A former Conservative party treasurer and an ex-adviser to George Osborne are among three peers facing punishment for refusing to take part in anti-bullying training.

All MPs and peers, as well as their staff, are required to join the ‘Valuing Everyone’ courses – introduced after Parliament was rocked by bullying and harassment allegations.

But Lord James of Blackheath, Lord Kalms and Lord Willoughby de Broke have now been named-and-shamed for ignoring repeated urgings to attend.

They will have their access to House of Lords services restricted, if a recommendation is rubberstamped by fellow peers, as expected, in the next fortnight.

Lord James was made a Tory peer after conducting a savings review for the party ahead of the 2005 election, before working for Mr Osborne, the then-shadow Chancellor.

Lord Kalms, a former boss of the Dixons retail group, was Tory treasurer from 2001 to 2003, but was later expelled from the party after voting for Ukip and is now non-affiliated.

Lord Willoughby, a hereditary peer, defected from the Tories to Ukip in 2007, but left the anti-EU party a decade later.

A passionate Brexiteer, he introduced a Bill for a referendum on leaving the EU in 2013 – part of the process that led to the Brexit ‘yes’ vote three years later.

A fourth peer, Baroness Mone, a Tory who conducted reviews for David Cameron, also breached rules by failing to undergo the training by the 1 April deadline – but later backed down and will not be sanctioned.

In 2017, a poll of union members uncovered that around one in five parliamentary staffers believed they had been bullied by their MP or line manager.

It was said to reveal a “toxic and dysfunctional relationship” between some MPs and peers, and their junior employees, many of whom reported long hours, unreasonable workloads, stress, anxiety and depression.

The courses hit the headlines after two prominent older peers, Lord Heseltine and Baroness Boothroyd, complained of being harangued to take part while recovering from operations.

But the Lords authorities insist the courses are “informed by real examples of inappropriate behaviour by members that had previously typically gone unchallenged”.

They also insist there is now a robust complaints process, with 18 complaints against peers having been investigated and reported on

Some 95 per cent of members who took part said they would recommend it to others, while 92 per cent said they were now better-placed to recognise inappropriate behaviour.

The authorities rubbished claims that the course had cost £750,000 as “wildly inaccurate” – but acknowledged a £100,000 bill.

The three peers to be sanctioned would still be able to attend the Lords, but would be restricted to “email contact only” when seeking help from key staff.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in