Parliament & Politics: No-strike deal for GCHQ ruled out
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ANY UNION wishing to represent members at GCHQ would have to renounce the 'right' to strike across its entire membership, David Hunt, the Secretary of State for Employment, appeared to insist yesterday, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
Questioned over the continuance of the union ban at the Cheltenham communication headquarters, Mr Hunt ruled out a 'no-strike' deal as the way round what he and the Prime Minister believed was a conflict of interest between union membership and security considerations.
'We believe . . . it is incompatible with membership of a trade union to have some members who can go out on strike and other members who cannot,' Mr Hunt said at a Commons Press Gallery lunch.
The implication of the remarks is that no organisation resembling a union as currently understood would prove acceptable to the Government.
John Sheldon, general secretary of the NUCPS, which formerly represented GCHQ middle managers, said: 'This is a clear public admission from ministers that no form of trade unionism is acceptable to them for staff at GCHQ, and it shows that they were never serious about complying with ILO (International Labour Organisation) Convention 87 on freedom of association.'
Charles Harvey, of IPMS, the specialists', technicians' and scientists' union, said no-strike deals had been reached between UK unions such as the former EETPU (now part of the AEEU) and, particularly, Japanese companies.
There were likewise many cases where workers in caring professions had never been asked to take strike action. 'Unions often operate self-denying ordinances,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments