Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parliament and Politics: Sea pollution treaty faces UK threat

Susan Watts
Monday 21 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ENVIRONMENT ministers from 12 European countries were locked in talks last night as Britain and France held tight to the option of dumping radioactive waste at sea.

The issue threatens to scupper the ministerial meeting, in Paris, aimed at reaching an agreement to limit industrial pollution in the north-east Atlantic.

Britain is refusing to sign unless the other 11 countries agree a compromise allowing the UK the option to dump intermediate and low-level radioactive waste after a 10-year moratorium.

The meeting should end today, when ministers hope to sign the new treaty. If any country refuses to sign, the treaty cannot come into force.

The new convention should update and merge two 20-year-old agreements - the Oslo and Paris conventions - limiting marine dumping of waste containing heavy metals and industrial chemicals that persist in the environment.

The Government says it is not dumping nuclear waste at present, but wants to keep the right to do so should it decide that this is the most environmentally acceptable means of disposing of bulky items such as decommissioned nuclear submarines and power stations.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in