Parliament and Politics: Code aims to ensure fair GCSE marking
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CANDIDATES taking GCSE exams will benefit from tough new rules to ensure the marking is fair, the Government's advisers on exams said yesterday.
Exam boards welcomed the rules but said they were 'fine tuning' and would make little difference to procedures that were already rigorous.
John Patten, the Secretary of State for Education, called for action after a report last year from Her Majesty's Inspectors expressed doubt about GCSE standards and the way some exams were marked. There has been longstanding criticism from schools that some boards' exams are harder than others.
The code, issued by the School Examinations and Assessment Council, aims to guarantee that standards in different syllabuses and across the five exam groups are the same. Groups will have to sign the code before their syllabuses can be used. Mr Patten said: 'This new code will put beyond doubt the credentials of the GCSE as a reliable way of measuring achievement at the end of compulsory schooling.'
David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said the good practice embodied in the code was in place before Mr Patten's attack. 'It is abundantly clear that the new code does not justify the swingeing criticisms of the GCSE which were made by the Secretary of State.'
Ann Taylor, shadow Secretary of State for Education, said Mr Patten should apologise to all young people 'whose qualifications he had cast doubt upon'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments