Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Paperwork `eats up jobless cash'

Barrie Clement
Thursday 22 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Much of the pounds 1.4bn of taxpayers' money spent on training the unemployed goes on paperwork and the system for delivering skills has fallen short of expectations, according to an all-party Commons committee.

Employer-led Training and Enterprise Councils now preside over a structure spending more than pounds 500m on bureaucracy, according to Labour members of the committee. While Tory MPs argued there was insufficient data on which to base such an estimate, the committee agreed that an insufficient proportion of Tec funds were being spent on the jobless.

It was found that while a limited amount of money was siphoned off by Tecs on administration, a far higher proportion was spent by training providers who were forced to cope with a proliferation of auditing systems.

An employment committee report on the work of Tecs yesterday argued that they had made a "modest" contribution to improving the system of training the jobless and promoting economic regeneration.

But the impact had "not been as dramatic as was hoped" and Tecs' performance in placing people in work and gaining qualifications appeared to reflect economic conditions rather than overcome them.

While some Tecs were performing well and others badly, there was difficulty in measuring their progress, MPs said. Angela Eagle, Labour MP for Wallasey, said there was a need to ensure that the auditing systems were simplified and rationalised. Tim Yeo, Tory MP for Suffolk South, said he thought the structure was "modestly worthwhile".

MPs divided largely on party lines over whether there should be ethnic and gender monitoring of Tecs and whether they should have places reserved for elected representatives from local authorities.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in