Panama papers: Sir Alan Duncan MP says critics of David Cameron are low-achievers who hate the rich
Sir Alan Duncan says: 'We risk seeing a House of Commons which is stuffed full of low-achievers'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A former Tory minister has sparked a furious backlash by appearing to say people who aren't rich are "low achievers".
Sir Alan Duncan, the Conservative MP for Rutland and Melton, was defending David Cameron in the House of Commons after the Prime Minister addressed criticisms over whether he had benefitted from an offshore fund set up by his late father.
Sir Alan said: "Shouldn't the Prime Minister's critics really just snap out of the synthetic indignation and admit that their real point is that they hate anyone who has got a hint of wealth in them?
"May I support the Prime Minister in fending off those who are attacking him, particularly in thinking of this place, because if he doesn't, we risk seeing a House of Commons which is stuffed full of low-achievers who hate enterprise, hate people who look after their own family and know absolutely nothing about the outside world."
Mr Cameron replied: "I'm very grateful for your support. We have a system of members' interests, which was put in place at the end of 13 years of a Labour government.
"I think we should maintain that system. I don't want us to discourage people who have had a successful career in business or anything else in coming into this House and making a contribution, and that's why I've said I think for prime ministers and chancellors, shadow prime ministers and shadow chancellors it's a different set of arrangements."
Sir Alan's comments drew animmediate backlash.
The Labour MP and former government minister Caroline Flint said she was saddened that Sir Alan appeared to say "if you weren't a millionaire you were a low-achiever".
She added she was "speaking as a low achiever" as she asked a question on multinationals publishing country-by-country tax information.
Sir Alan later attempted to clarify his comments on Twitter: "Seems I could have been a little clearer in Parliament today. Success is of course not always the same as wealth
"My point was that we shouldn't discourage people who've done well in business from entering Parliament by sniping at wealth per se."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments