Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Official use of personal data is 'deeply flawed'

Ella Pickover
Monday 15 August 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The way the Government uses and stores personal data is "deeply flawed", the Equality and Human Rights Commission said yesterday.

Current privacy law is not doing enough to stop breaches of data, a report published by the Commission found. A spokeswoman said that breaches in privacy are likely to "get worse in the future" as demand for personal information increases and as new technology is developed for collecting, storing and sharing data.

The report, entitled Protecting Information Privacy, suggests it is difficult for members of the public to know what information is held on them by the Government and its agencies or private bodies, and that it can be hard to hold anyone to account for errors in the personal data held or its misuse. The Commission has recommended that the Government make the current legislation simpler to understand.

It said public bodies and others have to justify properly why they need someone's personal data and for what purpose. Any requirement to use such data for any reason other than for which it was collected should go through a vetting process, the Commission recommended.

Geraldine Van Bueren, a commissioner for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said: "The state is holding increasing amounts of information about our lives without us knowing, being able to check that it's accurate or being able to challenge this effectively. This needs to change so that any need for personal information has to be clearly justified by the organisation that wants it."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in