Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Nuclear firms in rebuff to Byers

Geoffrey Lean
Sunday 12 May 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Government plans to speed up controversial developments by stopping the public challenging them at inquiries will actually hinder them, according to two of the companies they are designed to help.

Nirex, the firm in charge of disposing of Britain's nuclear waste, and British Energy, the country's main nuclear power generator, have submitted formal opposition to the plans to ministers.

Their objections explode the rationale for the emasculation of public inquires, first revealed in The Independent on Sunday last year.

They will be especially embarrassing for ministers at the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR), who had specifically cited nuclear waste facilities and power stations as projects that would "benefit" from "streamlining" the planning process.

Under the plans, which ministers will start to finalise later this month, Parliament will decide on the need for, and location of, the controversial projects – which would also include airports, roads, power lines, reservoirs, oil refineries, quarries and chemical plants.

Launching the proposals last year, Stephen Byers, the Secretary of State at the DTLR, justified them as helping "to get projects in place more quickly by cutting unnecessary delay."

But late last week, Chris Murray, Nirex's managing director, said the plans would "absolutely hinder" efforts to establish nuclear waste-disposal sites.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in