Nicola Sturgeon insists ‘I did not mislead parliament’ as investigation into Alex Salmond affair stepped up
Controversy has escalated with prosecutors set to release key evidence – but first minister slams ‘false conspiracy theories’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nicola Sturgeon has insisted she “did not mislead” the Scottish parliament, as an investigation into the Alex Salmond affair is stepped up.
The SNP first minister faced tough questions after a dramatic escalation of a bitter row over the non-disclosure of legal papers, with prosecutors set to release key evidence.
Mr Salmond, the former leader, alleges WhatsApp messages suggest Peter Murrell – the SNP’s chief executive and Ms Sturgeon’s husband – put the police under pressure to pursue sexual harassment allegations against him.
In March last year, he was acquitted of all charges of sexual assault and attempted rape, following a two-week jury trial.
Asked about the controversy, Ms Sturgeon vowed: “I did not mislead parliament. And that's what I will say all too clearly when I get the opportunity.”
The first minister was expected to give evidence to a Holyrood inquiry in the coming days, but said her appearance had been delayed by a “couple of weeks”.
On the Andrew Marr Programme, she was asked “what you knew and when you knew it about the allegations against Mr Salmond”.
But Ms Sturgeon insisted she would “never apologise for doing everything I can to make sure that complaints about sexual harassment were investigated”.
And she replied: “I appear to be simultaneously accused of colluding with Mr Salmond to somehow cover up the accusations of sexual harassment on the one hand – and then, on the other hand, of being part of some dastardly conspiracy to bring them down.”
Asked about her own spokesperson accusing her predecessor of spreading “conspiracy theories”, Ms Sturgeon said: “There are false conspiracy theories being spun about this.”
She added: “I will sit before that committee and I will set out my account of what happened, given the very difficult situation that I faced, and people can make their own judgments on that.”
Ms Sturgeon has insisted she first found out about a complaint against Mr Salmond on 2 April 2018 – and that she forgot about a meeting with his former aide four days earlier, which was not recorded.
Meanwhile, she accused Boris Johnson of being “frightened of democracy”, after the prime minister suggested there should be a 40-year gap between Scottish independence referendums.
“If the SNP win the Scottish election in a few months' time, on the proposition of giving the Scottish people that choice, then what democrat could rightly stand in the way of that?” she asked.
She ducked a question about whether she would hold an advisory “home-made Scottish referendum” if Mr Johnson – as expected – refuses to sanction an official poll.
“I want to have a legal referendum, that's what I'm going to seek the authority of the Scottish people for in May,” Ms Sturgeon said, “and, if they give me that authority, that's what I intend to do. That's democracy. It's not about what I want or about what Boris Johnson wants, it's about what the people of Scotland want – and the increasing evidence is that they want independence.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments