Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Nick Clegg: Leaders' TV debates will go ahead despite David Cameron's objections

Deputy PM says Tories are 'are swivelling around a lot' over the contests

Andy McSmith
Sunday 18 January 2015 18:10 GMT
Comments
Nick Clegg has said that introducing TV debates is “very difficult to reverse”
Nick Clegg has said that introducing TV debates is “very difficult to reverse” (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Televised debates between party leaders will happen, despite David Cameron’s continued refusal to commit to them, the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has forecast.

Now that televised contests have arrived, pioneered during the 2010 election, it is a development that will be “very difficult to reverse”, he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme.

Asked about David Cameron’s refusal to be part of the format jointly proposed by the BBC, ITV and Sky, Mr Clegg added; “He’s got to choose. The Conservatives are swivelling around a lot. One moment they want to avoid Ukip, now apparently they want to drop the debate between myself, Ed Miliband and David Cameron – I assume because they don’t want millions of TV viewers to be reminded that the Conservatives didn’t win the election, don’t run this government on their own, and many of the good things we have done in government are because of the coalition.

“It’s inevitable that in a highly fragmented political environment, the two big vested interests, the red team and the blue team – in this case, using the Greens as an alibi – would try to squeeze other voices out. They want to put the genie back in the bottle.”

The broadcasters have proposed that there be three debates – one involving David Cameron and Ed Miliband alone, one with Nick Clegg added, and a four-way debate with Nigel Farage.

Natalie Bennett asked Clegg if the Greens should be involved (Getty)
Natalie Bennett asked Clegg if the Greens should be involved (Getty) (Dan Kitwood | Getty Images)

David Cameron has objected to the exclusion of the Greens, who won a parliamentary seat at the 2010 general election and recently claimed to have more members than Ukip. The Prime Minister fears that Farage’s involvement may induce Tory voters to defect to Ukip, and has accused Labour and the Liberal Democrat of being afraid that their supporters might defect to the Greens.

When challenged to back up the Green Party’s claim to take part in the debates, Mr Clegg shied away from committing himself. The Green leader, Natalie Bennet, asked him directly: “Mr Clegg, will you perhaps get together with your two amigos, Mr Farage and Mr Miliband, and write to the broadcasters and say ‘include the Greens, as the public wants’?”

Mr Clegg responded: “It’s not for me, or for David Cameron or even you, Natalie, to tell the broadcasters what to do.”

He added: “Of course everyone wants as many raucous voices in our wonderful democracy as possible, but with the greatest respect, I am here to defend my interests, you are here to defend yours. You can put forward the case for the Greens, I am going to put forward the case for the Liberal Democrats.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in