Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

MPs told the word 'robot' is not derogatory, but only if it's an intelligent one

The bizarre row over whether the word 'robot' is unparliamentary erupted during a debate on the renewal of Britain’s Trident nuclear deterrent

Matt Dathan
Online political reporter
Tuesday 24 November 2015 18:08 GMT
Comments
MPs debate the renewal of Trident
MPs debate the renewal of Trident (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MPs have been told that calling an opponent “robot” is not a derogatory term – but only if they are referring to a “high functioning intelligent robot”.

The bizarre row over whether the word was unparliamentary erupted during a debate on the renewal of Britain’s Trident nuclear deterrent, led by the SNP.

After John Woodcock, a pro-Trident Labour MP, launched a scathing attack on the SNP’s record on education and health in Scotland, SNP MPs attempted to intervene.

But Mr Woodcock refused, saying: "I would be happy to take every one of you robots, getting your instructions, but the proposer of the motion refused point blank to take me."

John Nicolson, SNP MP for East Dunbartonshire, raised a formal objection to being labelled a “robot,” claiming it qualified as unparliamentary language.

But he was told by the deputy speaker Eleanor Laing that it did not – in this case – breach parliamentary rules.

She told MPs: “I was just turning over in my mind whether the description ‘robot’ for a member of this House would be considered to be derogatory and I have come to the conclusion that in some circumstances it might and in some it might not.

“For the moment, I am concluding for my own peace of mind that the honourable gentleman was thinking of a high functioning intelligent robot, and therefore for the moment I will not call him to order for the use of the word.”

Mr Woodcock continued his speech in defence of renewing Trident, telling the SNP: "I'll be happy to refer to them as honourable robots."

Earlier in the day Mr Woodcock hung submarine-shaped leaflets on MPs' doors outlining the argument in favour of renewing Trident.

The leaflet said maintaining the nuclear deterrent was “vital to maintain security in future decades”.

. @JWoodcockMP has hung submarine-shaped leaflets on Labour MPs’ doors https://t.co/8TmgBdqOB2 pic.twitter.com/lUHH1PqODU

The SNP's Pete Wishart responded with his own, hand-drawn diagram:

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in