MPs say bonfire of the quangos is a damp squib
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Coalition's much heralded "bonfire of the quangos" was a "botched" operation that will neither increase ministerial accountability nor deliver large financial savings, a Tory-led committee of MPs has concluded.
In a highly critical report, the Public Administration Committee said the Conservatives' pre-election promises to cut the costly bureaucracy of quangos had created "false expectations".
It concluded that the process to abolish 192 quangos and merge 118 more was rushed and there was no "coherent and consistent process" for deciding which should stay and which should go.
Last night sources close to the Cabinet Office Secretary Francis Maude suggested the committee had "misunderstood" what the Government was trying to achieve and had been "taken in" by the quango chairmen who gave evidence to them.
But Bernard Jenkin, the chairman of the committee, responded by saying it had been "very difficult" to understand what the Government was trying to do in the process that was announced in October.
"The whole process was rushed and poorly handled and should have been thought through a lot more," he said. "This was a fantastic opportunity to help build the Big Society and save money, but it has been botched."
The Public Administration Committee's inquiry found that there was no meaningful consultation with those bodies likely to be affected before decisions on abolition were made.
But Mr Maude said: "The process from the beginning was clear, which is why we were able to move so quickly. Departments assessed their public bodies against strict criteria."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments