MPs in expenses probe will not be identified
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The new Commons expenses watchdog is refusing to name MPs under investigation for dubious claims because it would be "unfair". The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), which was brought in to clean up the discredited system, initially indicated that politicians would be identified when a formal probe was launched.
It also suggested there would be a "presumption" for hearings with MPs to be held in public. However, the body's compliance officer, Luke March, has now insisted that details will not be disclosed until his inquiries conclude. If the MP is eventually cleared, there will be no official confirmation that they ever faced an allegation.
Ipsa's chairman, Sir Ian Kennedy, told MPs earlier this year that preliminary investigations had been launched into 40 politicians' expenses claims since last year's general election.
Mr March said many of the allegations concerned data entry mistakes by the MP or Ipsa. PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments