MPs criticise prosecution's £8,000 payment for Meadow's evidence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Professor Sir Roy Meadow, the paediatrician whose evidence led to the wrongful jailing of Angela Cannings, was paid more than £8,000 of taxpayers' money to testify.
Professor Sir Roy Meadow, the paediatrician whose evidence led to the wrongful jailing of Angela Cannings, was paid more than £8,000 of taxpayers' money to testify.
MPs queried why Sir Roy had been paid the money while Mrs Cannings had received no compensation for being wrongfully imprisoned for 18 months for the deaths of her two sons.
In response to a question in the Commons from William Cash, Conservative MP for Stone, Harriet Harman, the Solicitor General, said the Crown Prosecution Service had paid Sir Roy £3,462for "attendance at court and attendance at conferences", while Wiltshire Constabulary had paid him £4,730 for "preparation work".
Mrs Cannings, whose conviction was quashed in December 2003, was jailed for life after being convicted of murdering Jason, who was seven weeks old, in 1991 and Matthew, 18 weeks old, in 1999, partly on the evidence of the paediatrician.
The Home Office has refused her compensation on the grounds that she was convicted on evidence from independent experts, not a police officer or other state employee.
Sir Roy also gave evidence at the trials of Trupti Patel and Sally Clark, who were also subsequently cleared of killing their children.
Yesterday, Sandra Gidley, Liberal Democrat spokesman on children, said: "£8,000 is an awful lot. Angela Cannings received no compensation. The balance does not seem fair."
Mrs Cannings has called for a public inquiry into the use of expert witnesses.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments