MPs attack 'son of Star Wars' project
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tony Blair came under renewed pressure to distance the Government from American plans for a "son of Star Wars" missile programme yesterday after more than 100 Labour MPs signed a Commons motion attacking the project.
Some 173 backbenchers signed an Early Day Motion expressing concern at President George Bush's intention to abandon the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty with Russia in favour of a nuclear missile defence shield to protect against rogue states.
The MPs, led by Tony Lloyd, the former Foreign Office minister, Peter Kilfoyle, the former Defence minister, and the backbencher Malcolm Savidge, MP for Aberdeen North, included Liberal Democrats, Scottish Nationalists and the SDLP.
The motion opposing the US plan, which reflects widespread unease among Labour party activists, came after a warning this week by Russia's President Vladimir Putin that the world could be on the brink of a new nuclear arms race. Mr Putin suggested that Russia could install more warheads on its missiles as a defensive response to the threat posed by American proposals.
The motion endorses the unanimous conclusion of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, which recommended that the Government voice "grave doubts" about the project.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments