MP to repay £9,500 after 'misinterpretation of rules'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A member of the Shadow Cabinet is to repay more than £9,500 in second home expenses after a sleaze watchdog found him in breach of Commons rules.
But shadow culture secretary Jeremy Hunt will escape further punishment after MPs accepted an earlier apology over allowing his agent to stay rent-free in the taxpayer-subsidised home.
The Committee on Standards and Privileges said that while public money had not been diverted to the benefit of the Conservative Party there had been a personal benefit to the agent.
So long as Mr Hunt repaid "promptly and in full" £9,558.50 - half of the costs claimed over the period - no further action was required, it said.
Parliamentary Standards Commissioner John Lyon, to whom Mr Hunt personally referred his case, found he also breached the rules by claiming for a property when it was his designated main home.
He has already repaid that money and had previously said he was happy to hand back the second sum should the watchdog deem it necessary.
In a statement, the MP said: "I fully accept the Parliamentary Commissioner's findings and am grateful that he has ruled that neither I nor the local Conservative Party received any financial benefit from this misinterpretation of the rules.
"As he noted, I have already apologised unreservedly and have offered to pay back half of all the costs I claimed for this property over the period for which it was also used by my constituency agent."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments