Ministers to look into Monklands 'scandal': Allegations dominate by-election
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT is to examine allegations of discrimination and political wrong-doing at the Labour-controlled Monklands District Council, it was announced yesterday during the Monklands East by-election campaign.
Lord Fraser, the Scottish Office minister, intervened to undermine Labour's campaign in John Smith's former constituency, saying ministers would look into the claims surrounding the local authority after Labour admitted there was evidence of discrimination in decision-making.
He said he would 'closely study' figures obtained this week by Helen Liddell, the Labour candidate, which, she said, proved allegations that council spending policies were biased.
Conservative party managers said there was not enough evidence to order a formal inquiry into the council under section 211 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act. Frustrated by a lack of proof that the council's so-called 'Mafia' leaders have breached their statutory responsibilities, officials hope Mrs Liddell's admission will encourage dissident Labour councillors to speak out. One senior Tory said: 'Now that Labour have shown the way forward, admitting that all is not well in their rotten borough, the whole scandal could unravel.'
The allegations of nepotism, political corruption, and discrimination, which engulfed the council three years ago, splitting the local Labour party, have dominated the first week of campaigning.
Mrs Liddell, who had dismissed the claims as 'tittle tattle', changed tack after party workers warned Labour supporters were threatening to vote for the Scottish National Party in protest at the scandal. She wrote to the council asking for an explanation of 'disparities' in its expenditure. She called its decision to site prestige projects in Coatbridge, 10 miles east of Glasgow, rather than in neighbouring Airdrie 'unacceptable' and yesterday criticised councillors for not giving 'the people of this constituency the best possible deal'.
The Opposition parties seized on the split between Mrs Liddell and local Labour councillors. Susan Bell, the Conservative candidate, said: 'Helen Liddell and her party have at last confessed. Discrimination exists against the people of Airdrie. The council critics have been vindicated.'
The SNP, who have put the allegations of council impropriety at the centre of their campaign to overturn John Smith's 15,000-vote majority, called on Jim Brooks, the leader of the so-called 'Mafia', to 'fall publicly on his sword . . . for the sake of all the people of Monklands East'. Kay Ullrich, the party's candidate, urged Labour to 'move on from their admission that discrimination exists, to examine well-documented evidence of a 'jobs for the boys' racket'.
Stephen Gallagher, the Liberal Democrat candidate, repeated his call for a public inquiry.
Last night Mrs Liddell declined to comment on Lord Fraser's announcement. A Labour spokeswoman said the Government was 'perfectly entitled' to look into the allegations levelled at the council. 'We will wait to see what the results of any examination are,' she said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments