Ministers to abandon 'flood tax' plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans to impose a "flood tax" on two million homes in Britain's low-lying areas are about to be abandoned by the Government amid fears of an electoral backlash.
Plans to impose a "flood tax" on two million homes in Britain's low-lying areas are about to be abandoned by the Government amid fears of an electoral backlash.
The idea of a flood plains levy was raised by a Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) working group earlier this year as a means of raising funds to improve defences.
Huge sections of Britain, including East Anglia, the Thames Estuary, Humberside, Sussex and Gloucestershire, are liable to flooding but are protected by funding from the general taxpayer. Under the flood plains levy proposal, homeowners and businesses in such areas would be forced to foot the £600m-a-year bill spent on their flood defences.
Ministers have now been advised that the levy will prove impractical and unpopular, in preparation for a Government announcement on an overhaul of flood policy in the autumn. The advice follows warnings from councils that the idea would be "unsustainable". Labour chiefs have said that the party could lose key marginals as a result.
The issue of flooding has risen up the political agenda dramatically in recent years, with the floods of 2000 – the worst in 400 years – affecting some 10,000 homes.
Some experts argued that a flood plains levy would be fairer because it would force parts of the country that benefit from investment to pay for it. But ministers now favour two other options: a levy on developers and a precept-raising power for new regional flood bodies.
Under the plans, developers would have to pay a one-off "connection charge" to fund extra works in the area.
Regional consumer bodies would also be created to take over flood defences from local authorities. They would be made up of councillors from areas surrounding strategic rivers and may be allowed to make funding more transparent by charging a local precept for flooding on top of council tax.
A senior Government source said: "The flood plains levy was an idea from the steering group. It has dropped so far down the list of possible options it is virtually dead."
Derek Bateman, chairman of the Local Government Association's Environment and Regeneration Executive, said: "The most appropriate way would be to allow a precept to be charged. A flood plains levy is just not sustainable."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments