Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

MI5 denies Priti Patel shut out of intelligence briefings as Home Office civil war deepens

It comes amid ongoing hostilities at the Home Office, with Ms Patel accused of bullying officials

Lizzy Buchan
Political Correspondent
Sunday 23 February 2020 20:08 GMT
Comments
Priti Patel wrongly claims there are 8m 'economically inactive' Brits who can replace immigrants

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The civil war within the Home Office has deepened after MI5 was dragged into a row over whether the home secretary had been shut out of intelligence briefings.

A security source denied that MI5 bosses were failing to share information with Priti Patel as they “do not trust her”, insisting she received the same briefings as previous home secretaries.

The extraordinary row stems over claims in The Sunday Times that officials had reduced the amount of intelligence given to the home secretary and regularly “roll their eyes” at her interventions.

“The spooks find her extremely difficult to deal with,” a source told the paper. “She doesn’t grasp the subtleties of intelligence. It’s not black and white. They don’t have confidence in her abilities.”

It comes amid ongoing hostilities at the Home Office, with Ms Patel accused of bullying and trying to oust her top civil servant, Sir Philip Rutnam. Her allies believe the claims are being briefed to newspapers by hostile civil servants.

In a highly unusual intervention, a security source, said: “Reports suggesting that the home secretary and MI5 don’t have a strong working relationship are simply untrue.

“The home secretary is briefed daily on intelligence matters in exactly the same way as any previous post holder.

“No information is being withheld. Any reports suggesting otherwise is simply wrong and does not serve public interest.”

A government spokesperson said: “The home secretary and MI5 have a strong and close working relationship, and baseless claims to the contrary are both wrong and against the public interest.

“The home secretary receives the same daily intelligence briefings as her predecessors, and no information is being withheld.”

Home Office staff are said to have accused Ms Patel of belittling officials, taking an angry and aggressive tone in meetings and making unreasonable demands.

The Tory minister reportedly demanded the removal of Sir Philip, the permanent secretary, after he reported concerns over her behaviour to the Cabinet Office.

But a department spokesperson said they had not received any formal complaints and took the welfare of staff “extremely seriously”.

Sir Philip is himself facing criticism over the handling of the Windrush scandal from former home secretary Amber Rudd, who has accused him of being absent during the crisis, the newspaper reported.

The row comes amid wider tensions between Whitehall and the government, centred around the bullish approach of Boris Johnson’s top aide Dominic Cummings.

The former cabinet minister David Davis urged the PM not to conduct Whitehall reform by “firing squad” and said the government should not be making “hit lists” of Whitehall officials after it emerged that No 10 had set its sights on shifting permanent secretaries in several departments.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in