Met drops investigation into general election gambling allegations ‘as bar for misconduct not met’
The probe was launched after it emerged senior Tory officials and one of Rishi Sunak’s aides had placed bets shortly before the date of the election was announced
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Metropolitan Police has dropped its investigation into betting on the date of the general election, saying the bar for misconduct in public office had not been met.
The probe was launched after it emerged senior Tory officials and one of Rishi Sunak’s aides had placed bets shortly before the date of the election was announced, allegations that engulfed the Conservative election campaign in June.
The Conservatives eventually withdrew support for Mr Sunak’s former parliamentary private secretary Craig Williams as their candidate for Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr, along with Bristol North West candidate Laura Saunders, who was also alleged to have placed a bet.
Ms Saunders’ husband, Tony Lee, the Conservative Party’s director of campaigning, and Tory chief data officer Nick Mason took leaves of absence during the campaign after being implicated in the scandal, while Senedd member Russell George stepped back from the shadow cabinet in the Welsh parliament after being placed under investigation.
In a statement on Friday, the force said the “high bar” for proving misconduct in public office had not been met, following advice from the Crown Prosecution Service.
Detective Superintendent Katherine Goodwin said: “These allegations caused a significant dent in public confidence during the election campaign and it was right that they were investigated to explore all possible offences.
“While our involvement in the criminal investigation now ceases, it’s important that is not misinterpreted as an all-clear for those whose cases were looked at.
“There are still Gambling Act offences to consider and it is appropriate that they are taken forward by investigators from the Gambling Commission who have particular expertise in this field.”
A separate investigation was launched by the Gambling Commission into whether their actions broke laws on “cheating”. The investigation remains ongoing and could still result in criminal charges.
A section of the Gambling Act can cover attempts to improve the chances of a bet by using inside information. If convicted, a person can face up to two years in prison.
Meanwhile, the Met Police’s Directorate of Professional Standards is continuing to investigate seven officers alleged to have placed bets on the election date.
Gambling Commission chief executive Andrew Rhodes said his organisation had already interviewed “several suspects” under caution and continued to speak to witnesses and gather documentary and electronic evidence.
He said: “We clearly appreciate the level of public interest there is in this investigation but in order to protect the integrity of the investigation and to ensure a fair and just outcome, we are unable to comment further at this time, including the name of any person who may be under suspicion, or the total number of suspects.”
Mr Williams is alleged to have placed a £100 bet on a July election three days before Sunak announced the date at a Ladbrokes in his constituency.
He admitted having a “flutter” on the election date shortly before it was announced, in a statement saying he had “committed an error of judgment, not an offence”.
He added: “I am fully cooperating with routine inquiries from the Gambling Commission and I intend to clear my name.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments