Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Matt Hancock accused of ‘ignorance’ after claiming UK marchers not protesting against racism in this country

MPs and march organisers criticise health secretary for saying 'thankfully, this is all based in response to events in America rather than here'

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Sunday 07 June 2020 15:02 BST
Comments
Matt Hancock says Black Lives Matter protest not against UK racism

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Matt Hancock has been accused of “ignorance” after claiming the Black Lives Matter protests sweeping the UK are not directed at homegrown racism.

Labour MPs and march organisers lashed out after the health secretary said: “Thankfully, this is all based in response to events in America rather than here.”

Gary McFarlane, a Black Lives Matter activist, pointed to the deaths of British black men after being restrained by police “in circumstances not dissimilar to the murder of George Floyd”, to explain the protests.

Anger was also fuelled by Boris Johnson’s “racist remarks”, the “disproportionate” lockdown-flouting fines levied on black people and the ongoing Windrush scandal, with no blanket amnesty for those caught up in it.

“Hancock's comment betrays his ignorance,” Mr McFarlane told The Independent.

“This is the government that has brought us the hostile environment, the Windrush scandal and the mounting disproportionate BAME [black and minority ethnic] death toll in this ongoing pandemic.

“This is the governing party that refuses to investigate Islamophobia within its own ranks.”

David Lammy, Labour’s justice spokesman, echoed the criticism, saying: “Racism and prejudice exist in the United Kingdom as well as the United States.

“To suggest there is only a problem on the other side of the Atlantic might make Matt Hancock feel better, but it shows real ignorance.

“People in this country are not only showing solidarity with George Floyd and other African Americans. We must turn this moment into one of change and justice in the UK too.”

Diane Abbott, the former Labour shadow home secretary, said: “Hancock is completely wrong. Events in America have triggered the protests. But they are overwhelmingly a response to a long-standing issue about police brutality here.”

And the historian David Olusoga, appearing on the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme, criticised a tendency in the UK to dismiss “the psychological damage” from deep-wired racism.

“When black people have talked about how powerfully this moment connects with them they’ve been told ‘there’s no comparison with America, you’re exaggerating’,” he protested.

The comments came after Mr Hancock said the UK was not racist, but “one of the most tolerant and open societies in the world”.

“I think the substance of what’s been said, and arguments made by those who are marching, I think there’s a lot to it,” he told Sky News.

“I think, thankfully, this is all based in response to events in America rather than here but we also must continue the drive here for tolerance and genuine equality of opportunity.”

Mr Hancock also warned the protests “undoubtedly” risked increasing coronavirus infections, adding: “Gathering in large groups is temporarily against the rules precisely because it increases the risk of the spread of this virus.

“I would urge people to make their argument – and I will support you in making that argument – but don’t spread this virus which has already done so much damage and which we are starting to get under control.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in