Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Massow says Tories offered him peerage to stay in party

Andrew Grice
Saturday 05 August 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ivan Massow, the millionaire businessman who left the Conservatives for Labour this week, suggested yesterday that the Tories offered him a peerage by in a a last-minute attempt to stop him defecting.

Ivan Massow, the millionaire businessman who left the Conservatives for Labour this week, suggested yesterday that the Tories offered him a peerage by in a a last-minute attempt to stop him defecting.

In his first interview since his surprise decision was revealed by The Independent on Wednesday, Mr Massow told BBC Radio 4's PM programme that he rejected the offer because the Tories were trying to use him to convince voters they were a compassionate party. He accused them of speaking to the public "in rabid tones."

Although he refused to say whether William Hague had personally offered to make him a Tory peer, Mr Massow said: "If you are token acceptable face of some kind of compassionate conservatism that doesn't actually exist within the party machinery, if you are being used as a tool to encourage people to vote for you because they believe maybe you are becoming more open-minded and more tolerant, then it's not something I think I should have taken."

The Conservatives have denied Mr Massow was offered a peerage and his claims will fuel his war of words with the party of which he had been a member since he was 14.

Mr Massow, 32, admitted he may well have ended his political career by switching sides, saying few people changed parties successfully. "It is a kind of suicide jump very often. So I had to be aware of that before I did it," he said. He hoped that his decision would "allow people to focus on the fact that we have to put angry politics behind us and we can only tolerate a party who will bring compassion, tolerance and inclusion to the table if they want to govern Britain."

Mr Massow said his decision took three years to come to fruition. He said the recent tone of the Tory party, and its comments on asylum and Section 28 - the law that prohibits local authorities, including schools, from promoting homosexuality as a normal way of life - were "out of touch with contemporary, diverse Britain."

He admitted he may have looked like a "self-publicist", as the Tory vice-chairman Steven Norris called him, but pointed out that until yesterday he had written only one article about his defection - in The Independent - and not given any interviews. He believed his move attracted attention because he was "a catalyst for what lots of people have been thinking about the Conservative Party".

Mr Massow, who is gay, said he had tried to show the party why it had lost the 1997 general election: "They were out of touch. They didn't have a heat, they didn't have any compassion... Maybe I was trying to bully the Conservative Party into changing.

"After a while you give up trying to flog a dead horse... I was just sick of defending them on issues such as asylum and Section 28. I was sick of listening to the constant conversation they were having with the general public in rabid tones. I could see no reason to lend my name to them any more."

Asked if he could have joined any other party, he replied: "Some of the criticism levelled at me has been that you join a party because it is a tribe like a football club and you are supposed to stay with it through thick and thin. I just don't agree with that."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in