Margaret Thatcher described as 'very oily to kings' after insisting BBC apologise to Saudi Arabia over critical coverage
A BBC report from 1983 recounting allegations of mistreatment of Iranian pilgrims in Mecca drew a furious response from the Saudis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A diplomat described Margaret Thatcher as “very oily to kings” after she insisted that Britain formally apologise to Saudi Arabia over a BBC radio report.
An item on the BBC World Service in 1983 recounting allegations of mistreatment of Iranian pilgrims in Mecca drew a furious response from the Saudis, who claimed that the “anti-Islamic” report was linked to the Beeb’s appointment of Stuart Young, who was Jewish, as its new chairman.
The outburst led to then Foreign Secretary Geoffrey Howe sending a telegram to the British embassy in Riyadh asking for such “nonsense” to be “knocked on the head”.
But Foreign Office documents released at the National Archives in Kew, west London, show that Downing Street was far more concerned about causing offence to the Saudi royal family.
Diplomats were instructed to draft a letter from Mrs Thatcher to King Fahd, whose ministers signed the massive Al Yamamah arms deal with Britain two years later.
When the resulting text did not meet the Prime Minister’s expectations, Number 10 wrote back saying: “She believes that we should say that we are disturbed at this misreporting of this incident and that we are sorry that it occurred.”
The response did not impress the FCO. One diplomat wrote in the margin: “An object lesson here. PM is very oily to kings but matter of fact to lesser mortals!”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments