Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Macmillan called Castro 'the devil'

Chris Gray
Thursday 31 October 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Harold Macmillan described the Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro as "the devil" when sympathising with the efforts of President Dwight D Eisenhower to respond to the new adversary on America's doorstep.

The Prime Minister told Eisenhower in one of several letters in 1960 that Castro threatened America's place in the world just as Egypt's President Nasser had threatened Britain over the Suez Canal.

Despite assuring Eisenhower of British support Macmillan showed irritation that America was not being open on its intentions for Castro, and he later called off the correspondence. In July 1960 Macmillan wrote to the US President saying: "Castro is really the very devil. He is your Nasser, and of course with Cuba sitting right on your doorstep the strategic implications are even more important than the economic."

Offering British assistance, he said: "I fully understand and share your apprehensions. Do let me know if there is any particular point where we are in a position to help ... I feel sure Castro has to be got rid of but it is a tricky operation for you to continue and I only hope you will succeed."

Eisenhower asked Britain to help to ensure that no Western tankers ferried oil from Russia to Cuba, believing that Britain would be happy to help because a Shell refinery on the island had recently been taken over by the Castro regime.

Macmillan replied that Britain had no power to compel tanker owners not to carry Russian oil and added: "It would ... make it easier for us to help if we had a rather clearer understanding of your actual intentions. I know, and fully sympathise with, your purpose – the unseating of Castro and his replacement by a more suitable regime – but I am not very clear how you really mean to achieve this."

After a detailed letter from Eisenhower explaining his view of events in Cuba in which he ensured Macmillan that he realised toppling Castro was "fraught with difficulties" the British Prime Minister appeared to grow tired of the exchanges, which had been conducted through the Foreign Office.

He added a note to Eisenhower's letter, saying: "This doesn't amount to much. FO [the Foreign Office] must consider whether or not this correspondence should be continued." In terms that mirror present concerns over President George Bush's policy towards Iraq, the Foreign Office sent a telegram to Washington saying nobody knew who would replace Castro, what the impact on American relations with Latin America would be, and what the effect on Cuba would be.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in