M15 files will be open to scrutiny deckys
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Whitehall has agreed to open MI5 files to scrutiny by the Ombudsman in the latest piece of glasnost for the security services.
The move is only a partial concession because it does not allow their own activities to be criticised. The access is limited to security service files which shed light on the activities of other departments.
The concession is revealed by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, William Reid, in the latest report on his findings as the final appeal process of the Government's open government code introduced 18 months ago.
Mr Reid says the Permanent Secretary at the Home Office has accepted that "the files of the Security Service were open to me if that seemed necessary as part of an investigation even though the administrative actions of the Security Service are not in themselves subject to investigation by me".
MI5 is at present accountable only to the Home Secretary. There is to be a Bill enabling them to take part in fighting organised crime, but it is not clear how their conduct will be questioned as they move out of areas covered by the catch-all "national security" phrase.
Their higher profile in recent years has been largely cosmetic, confirming matters such as the identity of the director-general, Stella Rimington.
In his report on the latest six cases of the 64 referred to him so far, Mr Reid complains that Whitehall still seems widely unaware of the code of practice which is supposed to mean departments answer reasonable questions from the public freely and openly. It was brought in to head off calls for a Freedom of Information Act. There has been no advertising of the code, which means the public is largely unaware of its new rights.
Mr Reid says in his report: "One request for information was badly mishandled because staff failed to recognise the need to deal with it in the context of the code . . . In other cases, it was only after my intervention that staff approached the request positively."
Of the six latest cases, Mr Reid upheld four complaints.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments