Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lords reject George Osborne's plan for employees to sign away their legal rights in return for receiving shares in their companies

 

Nigel Morris
Thursday 21 March 2013 14:21 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

George Osborne suffered an embarrassing rebuff last night after peers threw out his plan for employees to sign away their legal rights in return for receiving shares in their companies worth as little as £2,000.

The scheme - announced at the last Conservative conference - was rejected by the House of Lords by 232 to 178 votes amid widespread criticism.

Lord O'Donnell, the former head of the Civil Service, said: “In the old days, the price of slavery was 20 or 30 pieces of silver. Is it now £2,000?”

Under the Chancellor's proposal, companies will from April be able to offer staff between £2,000 and £50,000 in tax-free shares if they surrender their rights to claim unfair dismissal, to redundancy pay, to request flexible working and time off for training.

The former Cabinet minister Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, one of several senior Conservatives to criticise the plans, described the idea as “ill-thought through, confused and muddled”.

He said: “I am astonished the Coalition would even think of bringing forward such a measure.”

The Government will now have to decide whether to overturn the defeat in the Commons.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in