Lord Taylor warns against changes in appointing judges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lord Taylor, the Lord Chief Justice, yesterday mounted a robust defence of the country's judges and the way they are appointed.
Warning that any changes could lead to a dangerous loss of judicial independence, he told the Commons Home Affairs select committee that the proof of the system was in the high quality and integrity of the existing senior judiciary.
He said one of its main functions was to protect the citizen against the abuse of power and the judiciary had proved "time and time again" in judicial review proceedings "that it was not prepared to kowtow to the executive".
Lord Taylor dismissed Labour's proposal for a broad-based appointments commission claiming that the staffing of it could be political and that some members might be determined to fight a particular corner. Now, senior judges are appointed by the Lord Chancellor, who takes soundings from other judges.
This system has been criticised for producing a predominantly male, middle- class, Oxbridge and public school hierarchy - latest figures show that about 80 per cent of senior judges have passed through Oxbridge.
But yesterday Lord Taylor said he was against any form of "reverse discrimination" which would ensure more women or ethnic minorities on to the bench. He said that changes which now saw people from more diverse backgrounds entering the legal profession would ensure that more would ultimately end up on the bench wholly on their own merits.
Lord Taylor also dismissed suggestions that judges were in danger of losing their reputation of independence if they continue to be called upon to head inquiries and committees such as the Scott inquiry and the Nolan committee, which become embroiled in politics.
Lord Taylor said such inquiries were usually set up as a result of a crisis in public confidence and there was no one better than an impartial judge, with no axe to grind and with experience of investigating the truth, to restore that confidence.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments