Schools must close to make second lockdown work, northern leaders tell Boris Johnson
Scientists also warn move increasingly likely – but would have been avoided if prime minister had not dithered
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Northern leaders say schools must close if the lockdown is to be successful, as scientists warned Boris Johnson the move is increasingly likely.
Andy Burnham and Steve Rotheram, the metro-mayors in Greater Manchester and Merseyside respectively, broke with the political consensus, saying keeping pupils at home was the only way to “get a grip of the virus”.
The call came as a member of the Sage advisory group of scientists, said school closures would definitely have been avoided if the prime minister had not dithered and delayed the second lockdown.
“The transmission would not be at today’s level and it would have been possible to certainly have kept schools open – whereas I think that is a question now,” warned Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust.
The latest ONS survey of infections found that “older teenagers and young adults continue to have the highest positivity rates, while rates appear to be steeply increasing among secondary schoolchildren”.
Both the government and Labour are insisting schools must remain open, even at the price of extending the four-week lockdown beyond 2 December if necessary.
But Mr Burnham and Mr Rotheram, hosting a press conference, said they feared their cities would “simply be put back in tier 3” at the end of the four weeks, without a rethink.
“I would suggest a period of two weeks’ closure towards the second half of November so that schools have time to prepare online learning,” Mr Burnham said.
“That would create the conditions for the biggest drop in cases that we could achieve and it would then create the conditions for some kind of Christmas for more families, because they need it right now.”
Mr Rotheram said the government had told them that 25 per cent of infections were passed around in education settings – a proportion equal to hospitality.
Universities should switch to full online learning, Mr Burnham said, urging MPs to step into the battle over education by staging a debate.
Both Professor Neil Ferguson, the Imperial College epidemiologist, and Professor Calum Semple, another Sage member, have warned school closures may be needed to tame Covid-19.
But when Michael Gove, the Cabinet Office minister and Mr Johnson’s effective deputy, was asked if he was “absolutely committed to keeping schools open whatever happens”, he replied: “Yes.”
He added: “All the evidence suggests that schools are not a centre of infection and that schools are safe” – standing by the view even when confronted with the ONS data.
The issue risks fresh embarrassment for the prime minister, because an earlier lockdown – as proposed by Sage and backed by Labour – would have coincided with the half-term holidays.
Keir Starmer said it would be better to keep schools open, even if the lockdown had to remain beyond 2 December, adding: “I say keep schools open and manage the risk.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments