Plan to end lockdown in England increasingly in doubt as government advisers urge delay
Experts warn UK is experiencing signs of a third wave of infections
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
Boris Johnson’s plans to ease England’s coronavirus restrictions completely on 21 June appear increasingly in doubt after a number of advisers to the government urged ministers to delay.
Experts warned the success of the vaccination programme risked creating a ‘false sense of security’ as the UK faces a third wave of infections.
The government should postpone the final stage of its planned roadmap back to normality until scientists understand the impact of a new, highly transmissible strain of the disease first identified in India, they said.
Labour said any decision should be guided by the data, but accused the government of being distracted by internal rows and “ministerial incompetence”.
Microbiologist Professor Ravi Gupta suggested a delay of even a few weeks could make the difference needed.
>> For all the latest political updates sent direct to your inbox click here to sign up to our range of newsletters for free <<
The UK was “not too far from reaching the sort of levels of vaccination that would help us contain the virus”, he told BBC Radio 4’s Today. “And I think that people are not saying we should abandon the June 21 date altogether, but just to delay it by a few weeks while we gather more intelligence and we can look at the trajectory in a clearer way.”
Prof Gupta, a member of the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag), which advises the government, added: “If you look at the costs and benefits of getting it wrong, I think it is heavily in favour of delay.”
When Mr Johnson set the 21 June date earlier this year he did not take into account the Indian variant, said Prof Gupta.
While the overall number of cases remains relatively low, the UK is seeing signs of a third wave of infections, he warned, adding: “All waves start with low numbers of cases that grumble in the background and then become explosive.”
The latest wave could take longer to emerge because of the success of the vaccination programme, he said, which could create a “false sense of security for some time... that’s our concern”.
Professor Adam Finn, from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, another body that advises the government, also called for the plans to be delayed. “It’s a really big question mark as to how fast that rise (in cases) is, and how high it’s going to go, and in those circumstances, we’d all be better off just doing everything we can to minimise that risk,” he told Times Radio. “So that we don't get to a position where we have to really go backwards in terms of the restrictions that we’re all having to endure.”
Fellow JCVI member Professor Robert Read told the BBC he thought it "quite possible that the government could move to full reopening" but it would depend on "whether we are seeing cases of vaccine failure" against the Indian mutation.
George Eustice, the environment secretary, said ministers “can’t rule anything out” when it comes to the final phase of lifting lockdown.
He conceded that infection rates were “going up again slightly, but from a low base”, and said the right thing to do was to reassess the data in a couple of weeks.
The shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth said any decision must be “based on data, to keep people safe and prevent overwhelming the NHS”. Reiterating an argument made by his party leader Keir Starmer at the weekend, Mr Ashworth said the single biggest threat to the planned unlocking was “ministerial incompetence”. Ministers were distracted by internal rows and blame shifting “at just the moment we need a laser-like focus on this variant”, he said.
“Weak, slow decisions on border policy let this variant in; continued lack of sufficient self-isolation support and a stand-off with local public health directors over vaccination policy failed to contain it. For 21 June to go ahead, ministers must learn from their earlier mistakes.”
Ministers, who are under pressure from businesses to reject a delay, are due to announce a decision in a fortnight’s time.
The British Medical Association (BMA), which represents doctors across the UK, urged the Government to "act with maximum caution when considering whether to go ahead with lifting restrictions on June 21".
"A premature ending of all legal restrictions which then resulted in a surge of infections would undermine our health service's efforts to tackle the biggest level of backlog of care it has ever faced," said council chairman Dr Chaand Nagpaul.
"It would also add further demands on staff who are exhausted, both mentally and physically."
As cases rise across the country, almost half of all new infections are now thought to be caused by the Indian variant. The seven-day rolling figures for deaths and hospital admissions are also rising again although the daily totals remain low. One further death was reported on Monday, with 133 hospital admissions and 3,383 confirmed cases.
Three quarters of the UK’s adult population (over 39 million people) have received a first dose, while just under half (25.3 million) have had both doses.
That total was given a further boost on Monday when more than 10,000 people were vaccinated at Twickenham rugby stadium after organisers opened up jabs to all over-18s at a walk-in event.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments