Lloyd warns of risk in Britain backing US missile defence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A leading contender for the job of chairman of the Labour Party's backbench MPs led opposition to the Government's stance on proposals for American missile defence yesterday. Tony Lloyd, who is contesting today's ballot for the job, warned that risking international opposition by backing the untested system would not be in Britain's interests.
His intervention during Commons defence questions opened the way for attacks on the Government by left-wing MPs, and a scathing rebuke from Iain Duncan Smith, the shadow Defence Secretary and Tory leadership candidate.
Labour MPs will vote tonight on a successor to Clive Soley, who stood down as chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party last week. A close contest is expected between Mr Lloyd, a former Foreign Office minister who will attract the votes of MPs worried at the party's direction, and Jean Corston, a former aide to David Blunkett backed by Blair loyalists.
Mr Lloyd, who led 173 MPs in protest at the defence shield plans last month, said it would breach the anti-ballistic missile treaty and warned that it could cause "massive insecurity" in Europe. The former Foreign Office minister asked Geoff Hoon, the Secretary of State for Defence: "Would my right honourable friend accept that there is sufficient uncertainty in the technology in this programme to make it difficult for us to draw conclusions?
"If the Americans were to abrogate the ABM treaty, if the Russians were then to step back and put their own missiles on to a hair trigger alert, this very uncertain long-term technology would simply not be worth the massive increase in insecurity in Europe."
Mr Hoon insisted that the Government had taken no decisions yet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments