Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lloyd Russell-Moyle: Labour MP apologises after accusing JK Rowling of using her history of abuse in transgender row

Andrew Woodcock
Political Editor
Sunday 28 June 2020 08:30 BST
Comments
Related caption: JK Rowling responds to accusations of transphobia
Related caption: JK Rowling responds to accusations of transphobia (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Labour MP has apologised “unreservedly” after accusing JK Rowling of using her history of sexual abuse as a justification for discriminating against transgender people.

Lloyd Russell-Moyle sparked anger with comments in an article in Tribune magazine in which he described the Harry Potter author’s disclosure as part of a “divide and rule” tactic to undermine efforts to secure rights for trans people.

But he today admitted he was “wrong” to suggest that she was not acting in good faith when going public over her experience of domestic abuse.

Rowling outed herself as a past victim of domestic abuse in an emotionally-charged blog post earlier this month responding to critics of her stance on transgender rights.

Her concerns over proposed changes to give biological men self-identifying as women access to single-sex spaces has seen her branded a “trans-exclusionary radical feminist” on social media.

In her blog she said her concerns were driven in part by abuse at the hands of her first husband, writing: “The scars left by violence and sexual assault don’t disappear, no matter how loved you are, and no matter how much money you’ve made… I pray my daughters never have the same reasons I do for hating sudden loud noises, or finding people behind me when I haven’t heard them approaching.”

Writing in Tribune in protest at reported government plans to ditch reforms of the Gender Recognition Act to allow self-identification, Mr Russell-Moyle mentioned Rowling’s comments as part of an effort by critics “cynically to undermine the rights of others”.

“We saw people like JK Rowling using her own sexual assault as justification for discriminating against a group of people who were not responsible for it,” wrote the Brighton Kemptown MP.

“Trans people are no more likely to be rapists; in fact, they are more likely to be victims of sexual assault themselves.

“That’s why, despite JK Rowling’s hate towards them, hundreds of trans people wrote to complain to The Sun when it trivialised her domestic abuse on a recent front page.”

After his comments caused a storm of reaction on social media, Mr Russell-Moyle issued an apology and asked for his comments about Ms Rowling to be removed from the online version of his article.

“I want to apologise unreservedly about the comments in the article that I wrote last week in Tribune regarding trans rights in which I mention JK Rowling,” he said.

“JK Rowling's first disclosures of domestic abuse and sexual assault in her recent article on trans issues were heartfelt and must have been hard to say.

“Whilst I may disagree with some of her analysis on trans rights, it was wrong of me to suggest that she used her own dreadful experience in anything other than good faith.

“I have asked Tribune to remove the line in question.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in