Tier 3 lockdown: Leaders demand answers over why gyms can be open in Lancashire but not Liverpool
Lancashire moves into toughest level of restrictions due to ‘unrelenting rise’ in cases
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Local leaders in Liverpool have demanded urgent clarification over why gyms have been allowed to stay open in Lancashire but forced to close in the Liverpool city region as both areas move into Tier 3 coronavirus restrictions.
Lancashire was announced as the second area of England to be placed under the toughest level of restrictions on Friday due to what health secretary Matt Hancock called an “unrelenting rise” in Covid-19 cases.
However, local leaders in the county managed to secure a commitment to keep gyms and leisure centres open despite the tightening rules from Saturday.
Under the restrictions, people in Lancashire will be banned from socialising with anybody they do not live with in any indoor setting or private garden and all pubs and bars must close unless they are serving substantial meals.
Casinos, bingo halls, bookmakers, betting shops, soft play areas and adult gaming centres will also be forced to shut.
Following the announcement, Liverpool mayor Joe Anderson questioned why people in Lancashire were allowed to go to gyms while people in his area were banned.
“Liverpool City Region has demanded immediate clarification on why Lancashire Gyms are allowed to stay open and Liverpools close,” Mr Anderson wrote on Twitter.
“Inconsistent mess - we now have Tier 3 A and Tier 3 B. Are Gym users in Lancashire more safer than those in Liverpool Region?”
Steve Rotheram, mayor of the wider Liverpool city region, echoed the call for clarity on the decision.
“The Tier system was meant to offer simplicity and uniformity. Instead, we're seeing a two-tiered system of tiers emerge,” Mr Rotheram said.
“How are gym users in our region more at risk than others? We were given no say in gym closures but this is just wrong.”
Areas placed into Tier 3 of the local Covid alert levels are all subject to a set of fixed restrictions, such as bans on households mixing and the closures of pubs and bars, according to government guidance.
The guidance also notes that some additional restrictions, such as the closure of gyms, leisure centres and public buildings, can be introduced.
It adds that ministers will “seek to agree additional interventions in consultation with local authorities”, based on evidence they have received on the spread of Covid-19 infections in certain areas.
However, both Liverpool leaders have argued this week that the restrictions were imposed on the area rather than agreed with local officials, with Mr Anderson claiming on Friday that it was “an absolute blatant lie” to say they supported the package of measures.
In response to the criticism, a government spokesperson told The Independent: “Soft play and car boot sales, which remain open in Merseyside, are closed in Lancashire, whereas the opposite is the case for gyms.
“Arcades, betting shops and casinos are closed in both areas.”
They added: “Intensive discussions with local leaders in both areas identified those which should close in each.
“We have been clear that additional interventions above the baseline for Very High alert areas are subject to consultation with local authorities based on local evidence.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments