Licence to export was needed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir Robin Butler, head of the Home Civil Service, yesterday denied a claim by the senior civil servants' union that Whitehall's political neutrality is being compromised.
In a two-hour appearance before an all-party committee of MPs, Sir Robin also contradicted a suggestion by Michael Portillo, the Defence Secretary, that the privatised Royal Ordnance company was uniquely exempt from normal licensing requirements for arms exports.
The Independent reported on Tuesday that a letter sent by Mr Portillo to Stephen Byers, a Labour frontbencher, revealed that Lord Justice Scott was misled during his inquiry into the export of arms-related equipment to Iraq and Iran.
Contrary to an assurance given to the inquiry, Mr Portillo said it appeared "some arrangement" must have been agreed that enabled the company to continue its exemption after its sale to British Aerospace in 1987. An eight-month trawl of more than 1,000 RO export licence applications showed a "relative absence" of supporting documentation".
Pressed yesterday by Labour's John Gunnell, Sir Robin said that although the matter was not within his personal competence, he had seen a briefing which contradicted the Independent and that the company was subject to the licensing procedures in just the normal way after its sale to BAe.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments