Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lib Dems to oppose secret courts at conference

Nigel Morris
Thursday 09 August 2012 22:24 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Government plans for "secret courts" to hear evidence relating to national security in private threaten to open a fresh Coalition rift.

Senior Liberal Democrats will raise fears over the proposals at their party conference next month as they attempt to distance themselves from the Tories over civil liberties.

The criticism is being privately supported by Liberal Democrat ministers who are anxious the plans could undermine fundamental principles of open justice.

Initial proposals by Kenneth Clarke, the Justice Secretary, for a wide extension of secret courts in civil cases have been scaled back in the face of protests from lawyers. Inquests have been dropped from the original provisions and judges, rather than ministers, will now have the power to hold sessions behind closed doors.

Mr Clarke insists the move is essential to allow sensitive material to be used to protect the Government from vexatious civil cases. But critics say the revised plans still put the intelligence services above the law and judges would be required to comply with ministers' requests for secret sessions.

A strongly-worded motion to the Liberal Democrat conference from activists calls for the plans to be dropped by the Coalition altogether.

The MP Tom Brake, co-chair of the party's backbench home affairs committee, said concerns remained that judges would be genuinely free of political interference.

A conference session will focus on worries about Home Office proposals to track mobile phone, email and internet use. Liberal Democrat leaders are prepared for criticism of their failure to deliver House of Lords reform, but believe activists' anger will be mainly focused on Tory MPs who blocked the moves.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in