Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lib Dems question use of offshore donations

Patricia Wynn Davies
Monday 21 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DONATIONS from an offshore account such as the one used by Asil Nadir to pay Polly Peck money to the Tory party should have prompted questions at Conservative Central Office, the Home Affairs Select Committee inquiry into the financing of political parties was told yesterday, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.

Tim Razzall, treasurer of the Liberal Democrats, which raises pounds 1.7m a year from subscriptions and voluntary contributions, told the cross-party committee: 'If that donation had come from an offshore account, considering that company had large assets in this country, I would have asked why that company was making such a donation through an offshore account.'

Mr Razzall and Graham Elson, the party's general secretary, called for an increase in state funding for political parties, but subject to two limitations. State funds should be matched to voluntary contributions, while general election expenditure should be capped, they said. The second limitation should be brought in even in the absence of state aid.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in